It was theoretically NOT possible with nreqs to make an OR-vector sich that you can't achieve an equivalent effect in reqs (provided that you don't bump into vector length limit):
!(a || b || c) <=> !a && !b && !c
If I recall it right, nreqs are innerly stored in reqs since the version when individual req negation was implemented.
For the building or unit problem, a long while ago city-performed action concept was proposed, when you can have multiple enablers for "Build Unit" or "Build Improvement" actions.
!(a || b || c) <=> !a && !b && !c
If I recall it right, nreqs are innerly stored in reqs since the version when individual req negation was implemented.
For the building or unit problem, a long while ago city-performed action concept was proposed, when you can have multiple enablers for "Build Unit" or "Build Improvement" actions.
Statistics: Posted by Ignatus — Sat Jul 20, 2024 6:33 pm